giocherà in finale ai China Open contro Tien


Battuto De Minaur, Sinner vola in finale a Pechino. Il n.2 del tennis si è imposto sull’australiano 6-3 4-6 6-2. L’azzurro, n.2 del tennis mondiale, supera l’australiano  in tre set con il punteggio di 6-3 4-6 6-2. 

Ora, Learner Tien, lo statunitense, di 19 anni e numero 52 Atp, si giocherà il titolo contro Sinner, dopo avere avuto la meglio in semifinale su Daniil Medvedev, costretto a ritirarsi al terzo set. Il russo, numero 8 del seeding e 18 del mondo, ha vinto il primo set 7-5, si è arreso nel secondo con lo stesso parziale, poi al terzo si è ritirato sul 4-0 per guai fisici.

 

 

 

Jannik Sinner e Alex De Minaur (gettyimages)

18/02/2024

Accolti da applausi fragorosi sia Sinner che de Minaur. Poi la partita, e la “pratica de Minaur”, per l’11a volta, è chiusa da Jannik ma non con scioltezza.

I due giocatori

Freddo, apparentemente di ghiaccio ma sentimentale e potente, intenso, ed in un momento difficile: è Jannik Sinner, che si trovava davanti l’australiano, veloce determinato ma anche “fumantino” (ruppe una racchetta proprio dopo aver perso il match point con il campione azzurro, nel 2024, in coppa Davis). In palio l’accesso alla finale degli Atp 500 di Pechino, ma anche i punti da rosicchiare per risalire la china fino alla prima posizione Atp, al momento saldamente in mano al suo “nemico” storico, Alcaraz

Sinner-De Minaur, una semifinale che scotta
 

Jannik Sinner contro Alex de Minaur, tennis Cina Open a Pechino, Cina

Jannik Sinner contro Alex de Minaur, tennis Cina Open a Pechino, Cina (Ansa)

Il sofferto gioco di Jannik
La “sofferenza” di Jannik alla ricerca delle soluzioni per rendere il suo gioco più imprevedibile, si era vista tutta, contro Marozsan ha rastrellato solo 12 punti nel primo set, ma nel secondo il quadro è cambiato. Una prestazione comunque da leone, senza scampo per il rivale in campo. Il tennista altoatesino ha continuato a sperimentare, mancando più occasioni per strappare il servizio e subendo un break al nono game, prima del contro break e dell’allungo sul 7-5. Però, rispetto almeno ai suo standard altissimi di gioco, la sofferenza c’è stata. 

Il servizio, l’aggressività: i punti dolenti del gioco 
A elencare i motivi per cui non è soddisfatto della prestazione di ieri, è stato lo stesso Sinner, sempre sincero e critico sulle sue prestazioni: “Ho faticato a tenere il servizio, più di una volta sono andato sotto 0-30. Ma nel complesso sono soddisfatto della mia tenuta mentale”, ha spiegato Sinner, dopo la vittoria sull’ungherese Fabian Marozsan per 6-1 7-5, in un’ora a 20 minuti. 

“Ho provato a essere aggressivo dal fondo e ad andare un po’ a rete, ma giocavamo velocissimi ed era difficile”, ha dettto il n.2 del ranking.

Jannik Sinner contro Alex de Minaur, tennis Cina Open a Pechino, Cina

Jannik Sinner contro Alex de Minaur, tennis Cina Open a Pechino, Cina (Ansa)

Sperimentare: la chiave 
Il tennista altoatesino ha continuato a sperimentare, mancando più occasioni per strappare il servizio e subendo un break al nono game, prima del contro break e dell’allungo sul 7-5. “Onestamente, credo non si debba fare sempre punto con le smorzate. A parte il fatto che non sono a quei livelli lì.”

Chi è Alex de Minaur: il “folle” indemoniato con la racchetta
L’avversario di Sinner a Pechino ha un profilo estroso, come idolo Roger Federer, un tatuaggio sul petto per la Coppa Davis, il “demone” Alex de Minaur si giocherà la semifinale all’Atp 500 di Pechino colpo su colpo, palla su palla senza mollare un attimo, questo è certo. Cocenti le sconfitte precedenti con Jannik. 

Classe 1999 e numero 8 del ranking Atp, non poco, l’australiano è approdato alla penultima fase del torneo dopo il ritiro di Mensik ai quarti di finale.

alex de minaur

alex de minaur (Ap)

21/11/2024

Carriera di de Minaur
Inizia a giocare a tennis a quattro anni. Due volte finalista alle Next Gen Atp Finals, ha conquistato 10 titoli nel circuito maggiore, incluso l’ATP 500 di Acapulco nel 2023 e 2024. Nei tornei del Grande Slam, al massimo ha raggiunto i quarti di finale. Il suo ranking migliore è stato la sesta posizione, raggiunta nel luglio 2024. 
 

ATP 500 Pechino, Sinner vs Marozsan

ATP 500 Pechino, Sinner vs Marozsan (ansa)



Source link

Jannik Sinner batte De Minaur in tre set (6-3; 4-6; 6-2) e va in finale all’Atp di Pechino per la terza volta di fila, trova Tien. «Ma ho avuto problemi intestinali»


Sinner più lucido di fatica e crampi: «Partita diversa dal solito, ma ho tenuto e sono contento». E ora la finale

(di Marco Calabresi) Dopo 21 set persi consecutivamente, Alex De Minaur è riuscito a portare Jannik Sinner al terzo, ma la miglior versione dell’australiano non è bastata neanche stavolta. Sinner (che ha chiuso 6-3 4-6 6-2) giocherà per il terzo anno di fila la finale a Pechino, sarà la settima in otto tornei nel 2025 (ha mancato l’appuntamento solo a Halle) e la trentesima in carriera (20 vittorie e 9 sconfitte il bilancio).

Per la seconda volta durante l’Atp 500 nella capitale cinese (era già successo contro Atmane), Jannik è stato trascinato al set decisivo: altre due ore e 20′ in campo anche oggi, un dolore al gluteo subito smaltito e un principio di crampi al momento di servire per il match. La fatica si è fatta sentire, ma la lucidità è stata ancora maggiore, grazie a una prima di servizio al 62% ma con un’efficienza dell’85%. Tra Sinner e il titolo, domani alle 8, uno tra Daniil Medvedev (contro cui, proprio a Pechino, vinse per la prima volta dopo sei sconfitte di fila) o il giovane americano Learner Tien, che ieri ha approfittato del ritiro di Lorenzo Musetti.

«È stata una partita di grande livello – l’analisi di Sinner -, con tanti grandi scambi. Io ho avuto le mie chance nel secondo set ma lui ne ha avute di più.  È stato un match molto equilibrato, in cui ho provato ad alzare il livello nel terzo set, ma in generale è stata una partita molto diversa dal solito. Lui ha servito e risposto bene, ma ho servito bene anch’io, anche perché Alex è un giocatore che si muove in maniera molto veloce sul campo. Ho cercato di rimanere concentrato e di non perdere troppe energie mentali, anche perché non ho avrò giorni di riposo ma solo una notte per recuperare. In finale, però, c’è molta più adrenalina e non vedo l’ora di giocare». 

De Minaur è cliente scomodissimo nonostante le dieci vittorie di fila di Sinner diventate 11: è il giocatore che ha vinto di più sul cemento quest’anno (34 partite, seguono a 33 Alcaraz e Fritz, protagonisti oggi della finale a Tokyo). Sinner lo ha capito subito, privilegiando il suo gioco tradizionale e senza ricorrere troppo ai cambiamenti che si è ripromesso dopo aver perso a New York: è sceso a rete con una volée di rovescio sulla quale è stato passato da «Demon», ma ha risposto con un due giocate straordinarie e una combo servizio+diritto, i primi tre di otto punti consecutivi che sono valsi il break sul 4-2. Jannik si è poi concesso un attimo di pausa nel suo gioco, ha concesso le prime due palle break della partita, le ha annullate e poi ha chiuso 6-3.

Due turni di battuta tenuti a zero a inizio secondo set, ma Sinner ha iniziato a concedere qualcosa dal punto di vista fisico: De Minaur ha allargato le braccia dopo aver sbagliato un rovescio quasi in segno di resa, ma è proprio in quei momenti che Jannik ha iniziato a toccarsi il gluteo, lo stesso muscolo che ieri era stato fatale a Musetti. E così le palle break (tre) le ha avute De Minaur nel sesto game, annullate con le prime di servizio, la terza addirittura con l’ace a mettere una pezza su qualche sbavatura. De Minaur ha poi dovuto mettere tutto se stesso per cancellare la palla break nel settimo game al termine di uno scambio massacrante che ha lasciato Sinner in ginocchio, annullando anche la seconda, e lo stesso Sinner ne ha dovute disinnescare altre tre nell’ottavo game (alla fine saranno 11 su 12) sempre grazie all’aiuto del servizio. Bene la battuta, meno il resto: un rovescio sul nastro ha dato il set point all’australiano, trasformato con un diritto all’incrocio delle righe.

La partita si è complicata, ma Sinner è stato bravissimo a riportarla subito dalla sua parte: break a zero nel game di apertura con un lungolinea di rovescio, tre palle dell’1-1 annullate (la terza addirittura con la seconda), altro break sul 3-0, con Jannik che dopo due ore ha giocato il primo serve and volley e nel sesto game la prima palla corta. Meglio badare al sodo, anche perché al momento di servire per il match sono iniziati ad arrivare anche i crampi, quindi era il momento di chiudere.



Source link

Wednesday Mid-Season Finale: Who Lives, Who Dies & What’s Next


Be warned, outcasts: This article contains major character or plot details.


Zombies and outcasts and death, oh my! Without her psychic powers, Wednesday Addams (Jenna Ortega) has had to spend the first half of Season 2 at Nevermore Academy using only her sharp detective skills to try and solve the murder mystery that’s become her new obsession: Who is the hooded Avian controlling the murderous crows, what are they hiding, and how do they figure into a string of outcast deaths dating back decades? Well, Episode 4 provides the answers to some of this season’s most sinister secrets — and much more.

When approaching the second season of Wednesday, co-creators and showrunners Alfred Gough and Miles Millar knew they wanted to split the season into two compelling chapters. But they also knew that would present a new challenge: keeping fans hooked and hungry for more when the credits rolled on Episode 4.

Millar explains to Tudum, “We felt that if we were going to split the season, then the end of the fourth episode needed to be something amazing; a cliff-hanger to bring the audience back for the next chapter. That was an exciting challenge.”

Gough adds, “At the end of Episode 4, Wednesday literally lets the lunatics out of the asylum, and the rest of the season is: Now you have to deal with that… She solved one mystery, and has unleashed a Pandora’s box of new problems.”

Let’s unpack every beat of that cliff-hanger mid-season finale, from the hooded figure reveal to Wednesday’s bloody — and possibly deadly — showdown with Tyler.

Who is Lois?

For the first half of Season 2, all of the answers seem to lie in the Willow Hill Psychiatric Facility. And Wednesday knows just the lunatic to help her get them: Uncle Fester (Fred Armisen). Fester gleefully throws himself into the chaotic business of getting himself committed, utilizing his 18 passports, 33 driver’s licenses (all under different aliases, from “Fester Diabolik” to “Fester Fiesta”), two rubber duckies, and a very loud rendition of “I Want to Know What Love Is” by Foreigner.

Once inside Willow Hill, Fester begins to crack the case. But in the meantime, he has the time of his life, an experience that Armisen relished. He tells Tudum, “Willow Hill is so Tim Burton. There was one quick scene where all of us as patients are painting outside, and one of them has no face. And I was like, ‘Oh man, I am in the right place. This is where I want to be in my life, doing a scene like this.’”

So is Lois a patient, a doctor, the cafeteria worker with whom Fester begins a torrid affair? It turns out that Lois isn’t a person at all, but the acronym for a horrifying secret program: Longterm Outcast Integration Study (LOIS). 

In the basement of Willow Hill, Wednesday and Fester discover the outcasts whose deaths had been faked, and whose urns had been falsified with animal remains — remember when Grandmama (Joanna Lumley) had Wednesday sniff that urn like a fine wine? She detected notes of deer, squirrel, raccoon, and shih tzu, but not a trace of human remains. When Grandmama bought the cemetery for Wednesday, the teen sleuth discovered that Augustus Stonehearst had signed the death certificates for the “dead” outcast patients who had all been cremated and interred there. But as it turns out, they weren’t dead. They were being kept in the basement of Willow Hill Psychiatric Facility as part of the LOIS program.

Outcasts Patricia Redcar, Julian Meiojas, and many others had been used as secret, living experiments. This was the mystery Sheriff Galpin (Jamie McShane) was trying to solve before the crows killed him; he was afraid his son Tyler (Hunter Doohan) would become part of the LOIS program. Meanwhile, Stonehearst’s experiments continue under the watchful eye of the hooded figure Wednesday’s been chasing all season.

A crow sits on a wolf statue at Nevermore Academy in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

Who exactly is the hooded Avian controlling the crows?

First revealed in Episode 1, the mysterious Avian has racked up quite a body count, including Sheriff Galpin. A cryptic clue left by Galpin eventually leads Wednesday to a remote hunting cabin where she discovers the faked outcast obituaries. It’s only when Wednesday sneaks into Willow Hill that she uncovers the hooded figure’s true identity .

But the Avian isn’t, as Wednesday initially suspects, Dr. Fairburn (Thandiwe Newton). It’s her chipper and seemingly harmless executive assistant, Judi (Heather Matarazzo), who hired Fairburn to serve as the face of Willow Hill while she continued her father’s work.

The Judi reveal scene was actually filmed on Matarazzo’s first day. Luckily, she knew the twist beforehand. “It tracked and it made sense,” Matarazzo tells Tudum of Judi’s surprising arc. “I had to understand her motivations very quickly. Al and Miles were very generous in answering my questions within the space of what motivates a character to do something. What is it that she had within herself? What was the drive of that ambition?”

Millar says of the big twist, “One of the challenges of the show is constructing a compelling mystery. We love the idea of leading the audience down the path and thinking that Dr. Fairburn is the bad guy. And then revealing that, actually, the hooded figure is Judi, the ditzy assistant.”

Judi’s father, Augustus Stonehearst, founded the LOIS program in an effort to harness outcast powers and become one himself. He longed to become a Da Vinci (outcasts with telekinetic ability), but his body couldn’t handle the experimentation. However, Stonehearst was able to turn his daughter Judi into an Avian, and Fester comments that Stoneheart’s experiments on his own daughter were “twisted, even by my own sick standards.”

Millar continues, “I love the idea that Judi was connected to Stonehearst, and actually Stonehearst is connected to Nevermore, so it all leads back to Nevermore and the secrets that the school holds.”

To bring Judi’s arc to life, Matarazzo endeavored to understand the character on a deeper level. “I had the backstory of who she really is, which was helpful. Which then informs the questions of, ‘Well, how saccharine is she? How sweet is she? How much of a show does she put on? And how exhausting is that?’ ”

It also informs how she put rigorous thought into how Judi truly views Wednesday — and how she ultimately underestimates her abilities. “Wednesday is a very clear nemesis for Judi,” Matarazzo says. “And I think Judi’s ultimate downfall is that she didn’tthink that she could get usurped by a teenage girl. There is an arrogance in her demise. So even though she is projecting this role of a secretary for Dr. Fairburn, she’s the one who’s really in charge of it all. And she feels that there’s no way, from her vantage point, that anybody is going to suspect anything. But Wednesday starts to unravel those threads, as Wednesday tends to do, and the whole thing comes tumbling down.”

Heather Matarazzo as Judi Spannegel smiles at her office desk in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

How do Judi and her father, Augustus Stonehearst, tie back into Nevermore?

Augustus Stonehearst once taught science at Nevermore Academy, and then worked as the Normie head doctor at Willow Hill. As Professor Orloff (Christopher Lloyd) recalls, “Gus was very popular. But I was never a fan. He was a normie and I never trusted him.” Orloff also reveals to Wednesday that Stonehearst’s wife died before he arrived at Nevermore, but he had a young daughter, and he built her an aviary in Iago Tower — the same ominous, abandoned location where Agnes kept Enid and Bruno hostage earlier in the season.

But after his failed attempt to give himself Da Vinci abilities, Stonehearst ended up a patient in the very facility he used to run. As Wednesday deadpans, “Confined to his own asylum, that’s a plot twist worthy of Poe.”

Armed with this information and a hot tip from Thing (Victor Dorobantu), Fester manages to track Stonehearst down within Willow Hill, and zaps his trash-talking parrot into squawking out a single clue: 51971. This turns out to be the passcode for a maintenance closet with a hidden doorway, leading into Willow Hill’s secret LOIS basement.

Matarazzo approached Judi’s involvement in her father’s work from a psychological standpoint. She explains, “Because her father’s focus was his work, she sees that, and thinks, ‘Oh, the only way that I can really achieve any kind of love or standing within my father’s eyes is to join him on this roller-coaster ride.’ Was it the fact that she had a desperate need for her father’s approval and that she never felt that she really got it? And so in her way, she wanted to surpass her father, but she also wanted to keep an eye on him. She didn’t kill him, she kept him in Willow Hill, within her space. She has a desire, I think, to soar and fly.”

Matarazzo wanted to understand Judi on a human level to do justice to her story. “Every character, I feel like, does have hidden motivations — unless, of course, you’re playing a sociopath or psycho, but even then, there’s at least breadcrumbs to understanding the genesis of how they came to be. I wanted to be true to the text and the world [Millar and Gough] created. And I wanted Judi to be the best villain, or perhaps simply the best misunderstood being, that she could be.”

So have we truly seen the last of Judi? Matarazzo has some ideas. “I was like, ‘What if she had a twin?’ I’ve always wanted to play a twin, as somebody who grew up watching All My Children and One Life to Live. There’s always that crazy twist. And again, as we can see in Season 2, even if you were considered dead, it doesn’t mean that you necessarily are gone.”

Jenna Ortega as Wednesday Addams holds a poloroid photograph and sheds a single black tear in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

What exactly happened to Aunt Ophelia, and how does that tie into Wednesday’s black tears?

When Wednesday asks Uncle Fester to infiltrate Willow Hill, he reveals that it’s not his first time in the facility. Years ago, Morticia Addams (Catherine Zeta-Jones) asked for Fester’s help checking in on her younger sister, Wednesday’s Aunt Ophelia. But by the time he managed to get himself committed, Ophelia had already flown the coop, and now she’s been missing for 15 years.

When Wednesday confronts her mother, Morticia reveals that during her sophomore year at Nevermore, Ophelia was discovered screaming in the quad with black tears running down her cheeks — exactly like the tears Wednesday has been involuntarily weeping all season. Ophelia had pushed her psychic ability too far, and was sent away. Morticia knew her sister’s condition would worsen at Willow Hill, but to no avail. Grandmama had Ophelia committed.

Morticia is determined to protect Wednesday from the same fate her sister suffered — and she’s already seeing too many similarities between the two powerful Ravens. When Grandmama tries to manipulate Morticia into giving Goody Addams’s book back to Wednesday, Morticia throws it into the fire. “My family is non-negotiable!” she says. It’s unclear what exactly the loss of Goody’s book will mean for Wednesday’s attempts to restore her psychic powers, but one thing is clear: Morticia Addams is going to protect her daughter at all costs.

Joanna Lumley as Grandmama and Liv Spencer as Varicose in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

Who is Grandmama Hester Frump?

Morticia’s mother Hester Frump, known to Wednesday as  Grandmama, is one of the few people who can get Wednesday to crack a smile. And only Wednesday can worm her way into Grandmama’s cold heart. On the other hand, the dynamic between Morticia and her mother is beyond fraught.

Zeta-Jones tells Tudum, “You think that the relationship between Wednesday and Morticia is a little strained? Well, the relationship between me and my mother is contentious.”

Lumley echoes, “[Their relationship] is absolutely ghastly.” And whatever happened with Ophelia is still a very present part of that dynamic. “[Morticia] doesn’t measure up to Ophelia.”

The Addams women will retain center stage for Part 2 of Season 2, and we’ll see even more of Grandmama. Gough teases, “We also reveal her relationship dynamics, not only with Morticia, but about how she feels about Gomez (Luis Guzmán). And it allows Wednesday to see her grandmother in a new light that isn’t frankly that flattering. Wednesday learns more about her family history and how these relationships came to evolve.”

Owen Painter as Slurp, a zombie, walks through the woods at night in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

Is Slurp regenerating? And what does that mean?

After being captured and committed to Willow Hill in Episode 3, Slurp (Owen Painter) briefly becomes Fester’s cellmate. In the mayhem that ensues after Wednesday breaks her uncle out, Slurp escapes, and has a feast — he eats multiple guards, Dr. Fairburn, and Augustus Stonehearst, now a Willow Hill patient. Before he chows down on Gus’s brain, he looks at the old man and speaks for the first time: Hello, old friend.

It’s becoming clear that Slurp is no mere zombie — he is regenerating, physically and mentally, with every brain he consumes. And he knew Augustus Stonehearst. So what exactly is going on with Slurp, and what can we expect in the second half of the season?

“We’ve seen Slurp beginning to humanize as he starts to eat brains in the first four episodes,” Millar explains. “And in the second half of the season, Slurp really comes into his own. We love the idea of seeing this metamorphosis. This seemingly harmless zombie who was Pugsley’s wannabe pet, has his own agenda. As he becomes more human, we have a lot of fun with what the audience will think he’s up to.”

Painter says of preparing for the role, “A lot of what I looked at early on was clown stuff, like The Three Stooges. Also, there’s this amazing silent movie called The Man Who Laughs, and I watched that a fair amount. That was one of my big jumping-off points, the Gwynplaine character in that film. That’s a really great way of communicating without being able to move much. The prosthetics feel almost like you’re working a puppet at times because it’s so thick.”

Evie Templeton as Agnes DeMille stands with friends at Nevermore Academy in ‘Wedneday’ Season 2.

Who exactly is Agnes de Mille, Wednesday’s stalker?

The final moments of Season 1 revealed that Wednesday has a stalker. And this season, we find out just who that stalker is: Agnes de Mille (Evie Templeton), a younger student at Nevermore. Eccentric and delightfully unhinged, Agnes is an outcast with the power of invisibility. Obsessed with Wednesday, she’ll do anything to earn her admiration and friendship — even if that means kidnapping Enid and nearly killing her in Episode 2.

But despite Agnes’ antagonistic origin story with Enid, this “pint-sized psycho” has already become a key part of the Nevermore crew this season. Her powers of invisibility prove invaluable to Wednesday’s investigation, and Agnes will do anything to impress Wednesday — even if that means planting sticks of dynamite to help her anti-heroine break into Willow Hill.

Millar says of Agnes, “One of the highlights of Season 2 has been the relationship between Agnes, Enid, and Wednesday. We felt it was important to challenge Wednesday and Enid’s relationship. How does Wednesday navigate the idea of friendship? We put Agnes in the middle of it –– she’s this Wednesday superfan, and someone who believes she is a natural best friend for Wednesday. Agnes does something very extreme in Episode 2 and almost kills Enid. How does Enid reconcile that near-death experience with this growing friendship she sees between Wednesday and Agnes?”

And Templeton is eager for fans to not just meet Agnes, but to understand the universal message behind her journey. “I’m obviously really excited to introduce my character and that trio dynamic that’s going to start to appear between Enid, Wednesday, and Agnes,” Templeton tells Tudum. “Also, there’s a very important message to be yourself, even if you feel like you don’t always fit in. It’s OK to stand out and be different, which is quite impactful for my generation.”

Emma Myers as Enid Sinclair and Noah B. Taylor as Bruno stand close to each other at Nevermore Academy in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

What’s going on with Enid, Ajax, and Bruno?

It simply wouldn’t be high school without a werewolf love triangle. After wolfing out at the end of last school year and having the best summer ever, Enid (Emma Myers) returns to Nevermore with a new group of wolf-pack friends — and a new romantic interest in Bruno, played by new cast member Noah B. Taylor.

“She’s finally growing into that part of her life, and so Bruno represents everything she’s ever wanted,” Myers tells Tudum. “Enid’s always wanted to be popular, and Bruno is popular, so she feels like she’s fitting in. Bruno’s really, really kind to her. She feels like she’s finally being seen, and she’s finally with her people. I think that’s what really attracts Enid to Bruno. He’s also new, exciting, and fresh.”

But as the sparks fly with Bruno, Enid seems unable to tell Ajax (Georgie Farmer), her flame from last year, exactly what’s going on.

Myers explains, “Enid feels bad for Ajax, and she does care about him. He’s still a part of her life and still a part of her old self, and she has a hard time letting that go. She doesn’t want to hurt Ajax’s feelings, but she can’t fully commit to being done with him. I don’t think that, all in all, Enid definitely knows what she wants — it takes this season for her to figure it out. She doesn’t do anything from a place of meanness; she just really doesn’t want to hurt Ajax because she cares about him. But in turn, by not telling him, that hurts him more than it would have if she had just been up front with him.”

Meanwhile, Ajax is growing closer to someone else as well: Bianca Barclay (Joy Sunday). While Bianca juggles school, extracurricular activities, being extorted by Principal Dort (Steve Buscemi), and keeping her mom safe and hidden from the dangerous Morning Song cult she recently escaped, she finds a new and surprising source of support in Ajax.

“Bianca’s relationship with Ajax is really special this time around because we’ve never really seen Bianca lean on somebody before, and that plays into the vulnerability she’s learning to embrace,” Sunday tells Tudum. “It’s sweet to see Bianca depend on someone, since her life was always so unstable and she’s always had to work for herself. It’s lovely for her to finally have a friend that she can look to for help.”

And in Episode 4, the stakes only get higher for our lovelorn Nevermore crew. “In Episode 4, explosions — metaphorical and literal — are happening everywhere all at once,” Sunday says. “We leave off really not knowing where it’s going to go. You can expect a lot of twists and turns, and a lot of clarity as to who these new characters are.”

Fred Armisen as Uncle Fester and Jenna Ortega as Wednesday Addams look through a wicket in Willow Hill in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

Did Tyler really kill his former master? Is Marilyn Thornhill truly dead?

When Dr. Fairburn brings Marilyn Thornhill (Christina Ricci) to Willow Hill, she says that her hope is to better understand exactly what Thornhill did to Tyler so that she can begin to rehabilitate him. But Thornhill, of course, has no intention of helping with Tyler’s treatment. Instead, master and monster reunite briefly, and their dynamic is as sick and twisted as ever.

Hunter Doohan tells Tudum, “Tyler’s totally unhinged in a way that we haven’t seen him before. We talked a little bit about wanting him to feel like a caged animal and unpredictable, especially in the first half of the season. You don’t know what he’s thinking and what he’s planning on doing.”

After Judi reveals her true identity and prepares to kill Fester and Wednesday, Fester generates a massive burst of electricity that cuts the power across Willow Hill. The surge causes the patients’ doors to open, freeing them — including Tyler, who’s been kept under lock and key all season, unable to transform into his full Hyde form. Thornhill rushes to Tyler, but isn’t met by a thankful protégé. She’s confronted by a vengeful, unbridled Hyde.

“Christina Ricci is back as Marilyn Thornhill,” Doohan tells Tudum. “I was so excited when I read in the scripts that Dr. Fairburn brings her character to come see Tyler. They’re hoping that bringing her in can help make Tyler better, but he feels betrayed and abandoned by her. He believes his only chance to be free is to free himself from her control … which, unfortunately for her, does mean murdering her.”

In their final moments together, Tyler whispers to Thornhill, “You’re not my mother, you’re my master. Or should I say, you were…”. Then he offers her a terrifying five-second head start in repayment for unlocking his full potential over the course of their long and tortured relationship. He gives a terrifying reading of one word: Run. Then, in full Hyde mode, Tyler chases down his master and plunges his claws into her torso.

When it came time to film that moment, Doohan tried to understand the psychological reasoning behind Tyler’s actions. “He’s thinking, ‘The only way I can be free is to kill her, and then I’ll finally have my full power, and I can just make my own choices.’ He doesn’t know yet that he’s not going to be able to survive without a master, so he’s potentially signing his own death warrant. But he sees it as his only option. Tyler’s got a lot of hurt and feelings of abandonment underneath all the rage — but even though their bond is weakened, it’s still there. And so it is also hard for him. I was trying to play both of those feelings at the same time.”

And as for delivering that terrifying “run” line? The whole team knew it was a key beat. “I loved that moment in the script,” says Doohan. “I loved the way he toys with her, and how he’s looking down on her like, ‘What don’t you get about this? You better go.’ Right after we shot that scene and that line, Al and Miles were like,  ‘Oh, that’s going to be a trailer moment.’ ” (And it was.)

So is Marilyn Thornhill truly dead? “Christina Ricci is just an amazing person and actor, and she brings such value to the show, and the character’s so wonderful,” Gough says. “Never say never.”

Millar adds, “I will say, in this show, no one is officially dead dead. There’s always a way.”

Hunter Doohan as Tyler Galpin chained to a wall in Willow Hill in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

Where’s Tyler? And what will happen to him now?

As Marilyn Thornhill says earlier in the episode, “If a Hyde murders their master, they seal their own doom.”

So what does that mean for Tyler? He’s killed his master, he’s escaped Willow Hill, but is he free? And how will he survive now?

Gough tells Tudum, “Getting more into the Hyde mythology, when you kill off your master, a Hyde will eventually go crazy. The idea is that Thornhill puts him in this position, and he kills her off in a fit of rage. What’s going to happen once he’s out without a master? That just seemed like a very interesting place, narratively. You have a deranged monster who’s slowly losing his mind. There are moments that you can see the real Tyler, and his feelings, fighting against his Hyde side — and there’s even more of that being explored in the second half of Season 2.”

Jenna Ortega as Wednesday Addams shows a shocked expression in ‘Wednesday’ Season 2.

Is Wednesday dead? Did she survive that big final showdown with Tyler?

From the beginning of the series, Wednesday and Tyler have been a key part of the narrative. Their ending last season set the stage for a tense reunion at the top of Season 2, when Wednesday went to Willow Hill to inform Tyler his father had been murdered.

“Tyler’s been spending every waking moment in Willow Hill obsessing over the next chance he’ll get to see Wednesday,” Doohan tells Tudum. “When she finally comes to see him at Willow Hill, it doesn’t go the way he planned. Tyler is holding onto his connection to Wednesday. And then he finds she’s only there to get information to help her new investigation, which really pisses Tyler off.”

During that initial reunion, Tyler isn’t able to fully Hyde out. But with the shock collar off and his master dead, Tyler’s next target is clear: Wednesday. Once he finds her, he doesn’t hold back. Tyler grabs Wednesday and throws her through a window.  She falls from a devastating height, hits the cobblestones, and lies bleeding — her fate unknown.

“I’ve always dreamed of looking death in the face,” Wednesday tells us in what may be her last voice-over. “But in my final moments, all I hear is my mother’s words ringing in my ears. Maybe I have made everything worse. Much worse.”

Jenna Ortega tells Tudum of shooting that particular scene, “I absolutely love that we didn’t see Tyler actually physically throw Wednesday out the window. That was Tim Burton’s last-minute idea where you just see the tension between the two before it happens, and then what breaks the silence is the shattering of the glass. I thought that was a cool way to end that episode. If you’re going to have a break in a season like that, it’s nice to leave on probably the darkest note that we’ve ever left on in an episode. I was excited to do that midway through the season.”

Millar says of the shoot, “We talked about that scene a lot … I remember standing outside the location and looking at the window, saying, ‘That’s really, really high.’ ”

Did Wednesday survive the fall? And even if she does survive, what will be the consequences going forward? Doohan shares, “Tyler might have killed Wednesday; he throws her out a window and makes his escape. It leaves Wednesday with an uncertain fate — and also a lot of new threats if she does wake up.”

But despite all the lingering uncertainty, one thing is for sure: it was a fun sequence to shoot. “ Tim and I were crying laughing,” Ortega says. “We had so much fun shooting that. It was great to see Wednesday in that Willow Hill environment. Makes total sense that she would release a bunch of patients from a psych ward.”

The chaos of the mid-season finale will lead us into the final four episodes of Wednesday Season 2, out Sept. 3. “Fans have a lot to look forward to in the second half of the season,” Doohan teases. And Gough adds, “The mysteries of Willow Hill definitely carry over into Part 2.”

Start that countdown, outcasts — September cannot come soon enough.

Wednesday Season 2, Part 1 is now streaming on Netflix. Part 2 will premiere on Sept. 3. 

Want a sneak peek of Part 2?

Watch below, if you dare…

Watch the Wednesday Season 2, Part 2 Teaser



Source link

‘You’ Finale Review: Bronte Should’ve Aimed Higher


Photo: CLIFTON PRESCOD/NETFLIX

Spoilers follow for the You series finale.

So this is how Joe Goldberg’s story ends: with a public trial that condemns him to life in prison, devoid of touch and women to obsess over, but not before Bronte, his latest infatuation, shoots off his dick and his gored groin becomes the centerpiece for a viral video of his arrest. This arrangement of justice is true to form for You, which traffics in swooning gestures and cute, tidy outcomes for its protago-villain. Speaking with Deadline, Penn Badgley, who plays Joe, contextualized the choice against a larger cultural reckoning with “bad men.” “It does become a question of, ‘What do we do with people like Joe?’” he says. “If somebody was to kill him — and it would be a woman, right — well then actually now what you’ve burdened her with is having committed murder. Torture? Uh, okay, same thing. Prison? Eh, feels a bit not enough. So what do you do?” And thus they landed on the ruination of his junk.

It’s a splashy climax, and pretty amusing, too. Clad in nothing but his underwear, Joe pursues Bronte through the woods like a demon, and Badgley goes hard on making Joe sound like a teeny, whiny baby. “Kill me,” he says, voice squeaking once he realizes he’s been caught. “Please. I know you have it in you!” (Badgley has been consistently great throughout the series, and in a just world he would be in the Emmys conversation.) The move to maim his member also places Joe within the long tradition of castration as the worst possible thing you could do to a dude onscreen. Think back to Theon Greyjoy’s neutering on Game of Thrones, which plays out as the central pillar of his torturer’s campaign to annihilate the character’s sense of self, or the famously thorny scene in Pulp Fiction where Marsellus Wallace exacts revenge on his rapist by firing a shotgun at the guy’s genitals. Castration recurs in pop culture as comeuppance for men who inflict or threaten violence on women: Recall Robocop blasting the family jewels off a nameless criminal attempting to sexually assault a woman on the street or the sequence in Hard Candy where 14-year-old Hayley convinces the pedophile she’s torturing that she’s surgically removing his testicles.

There’s a straightforward logic in subjecting Joe to the same fate; the guy is a warped embodiment of the “but I’m one of the good ones” softboi misogynist who in this case also happens to be a serial killer. There’s narrative justice in lumping him with the weasel, the depraved, the criminal, the pedophile. Yet given everything creators Sera Gamble and Greg Berlanti have communicated about Joe over the show’s five seasons, castration doesn’t quite feel satisfying as a proportional symbolic response to Joe’s tenure of terror. Shooting his dick off is a great punchline, but it’s imprecise.

What made Joe so distinctive as the show’s central figure isn’t just that he’s a serial killer. It’s that he constructs fantasies and narratives about himself to justify his actions. In his mind, he kidnaps, tortures, and kills countless others in the service of love, reframing his use of violence within an internal logic of self-defense or an expression of trauma-induced mental sickness. In this final season, Joe’s internal narrative takes on a valence of self-determination: His violent urges are immutable parts of himself, so leaning into them amounts to a form of radical self-acceptance, and unleashing them against people who “deserve it” (abusive boyfriends, evil executives, smarmy therapists) is analogous to a harm-reduction technique. When it comes to the lovers he’s destroyed, well, there’s plenty to rationalize there, too: Beck didn’t measure up, Love also turned out to be a killer, Kate never accepted him anyway. (Though Marienne didn’t actually die at the end of the fourth season, you figure he’d chalk up her apparent overdose as an accident. Whoopsie.) The beating heart of his monstrosity isn’t his sexual cravings but his sense of romanticism and righteousness, the things that make Joe so compelling as a metaphor for very real men.

Dickless Joe would’ve been a satisfying payoff if You was just contained to its first season. There’s a magic trick to building a story around the villain, and if justice is the endgame, it really should be doled out expeditiously; otherwise, the narrative loses its moral authority of fundamental opposition to its central character. But You went on for four more seasons, and the task of producing a proportionally satisfying comeuppance grew more complicated with each Joe getaway. There’s also the fact that the series is so darn entertaining, an outcome predicated on eliciting an affinity for Joe by virtue of his positioning as the story’s main point of view, his (perfectly reasonable!) class critiques as he infiltrates various glamorous worlds, and the procession of idiots who parade into his life as plot hurdles to navigate (or kill). It’s slippery to make a villain both your protagonist and your target of deconstruction, and the more story You gives Joe, the harder it becomes for it to also challenge the mythologies protecting dangerous men like him. It also gets more difficult to point the finger at society for creating conditions that enable behavior like this when that really means you’re pointing the finger at viewers for wanting to root for someone like Joe. You can’t reap the rewards of successfully making him a protagonist while angsting against the audience feedback loop producing those rewards.

If you boil down Joe’s romantic fantasies as a mere cover for what he always was — a predator acting on violent sexual urges — you could argue that castration serves as a fitting symbol for his atrocities. But for that to really work, You needed to spend a lot more time unpacking Joe’s downfall, which is ultimately compressed into a ten-minute-ish coda slapped on the very end of the series finale. If the fundamental project was to deconstruct Joe’s self-mythologizing, there should’ve been a whole episode forcing him to confront his own monstrosity. (I guess I’m saying You’s series finale should’ve taken a thing or two from Seinfeld’s.)

The more You fleshed Joe out as a character, the bigger the distance grew between him and what he symbolizes: the threat of how any decent-seeming man could, within the space of a heartbeat, reveal himself to be a monster all along, a monster who believes himself to be the hero of his own romantic story with such ferocity that he’s able to convince others to join him in his fantasy. “What is wrong with me that I know who you are and part of me can still feel this good?” Bronte wonders in the finale, even as she prepares to take Joe down. “But who doesn’t love to be loved?” Of course, it’s not really her fault, or the fault of any of the other women who fell victim to his carnage. As she later screams, the fantasy of men like him is how women deal with the reality of men like him — a fantasy he’s all too eager to speak into being. She should’ve aimed for his mouth instead.



Source link

Why Warriors benched Jonathan Kuminga in pivotal season finale


The Warriors’ scripted rotation plan on Sunday had exactly zero minutes penciled in for Jonathan Kuminga.

The conditions of a game make any plan subject to change, but in a 124-119 overtime loss to the Clippers, head coach Steve Kerr stuck to the script. Kuminga got his first DNP of the season in Golden State’s biggest game of the year so far, one that sent them into the play-in round to face the Grizzlies.

Kerr’s public messaging has been hinting toward this direction. He has said that the Warriors’ offensive flow has been choppy for the past few weeks, which is when Kuminga returned from his severe ankle sprain. Kuminga’s fit in certain lineups, particularly alongside star Jimmy Butler, has been a problem. And in the highest-stakes contests, like Sunday’s finale to decide the sixth seed, every minute counts. 

“When you get to these tight games, you tighten up your rotation and you play your guys, and you go for it,” Kerr said postgame. 

Butler played 48 minutes. Brandin Podziemski played 43. Steph Curry and Draymond Green each logged 38 and Moses Moody played 30. It was essentially a playoff game, and the Warriors treated it as such, going with Gary Payton II, Buddy Hield, Kevon Looney, and Quinten Post off the bench. 

Against the Clippers, those were the nine guys Kerr trusted. 

“We just found a group since Jimmy got here that we’re pretty comfortable with,” Kerr said. “Gui (Santos) didn’t play, either. Gui’s been our highest plus-minus guy over the past two months. Both he and JK have been really impactful players for us. Doesn’t mean they’re out of the loop going forward, it’s just this is how this game played out.” 

Kuminga, the seventh overall pick in the 2021 NBA draft, declined to comment. Before Sunday, the last time he got a DNP-Coaches Decision was in the 2023 Western Conference semifinals against the Lakers. 

Before the Butler trade that saved the Warriors’ season, Kuminga was playing the best basketball of his career. Handling a heavier playmaking role, he averaged 21.1 points and 6.3 rebounds in 13 games before suffering a Grade 3 ankle sprain. He notched three 30-point games in that stretch, including in an impressive win over the Rockets without Curry and Green. 

The Warriors have always wanted Kuminga to commit to defense and rebounding — to leverage his athleticism to impact winning — and he has done that for stretches this season. Golden State has 12 lineups that have outscored opponents by at least 10 points per 100 possessions, and Kuminga is a part of four of them. 

But none of them are with Butler. 

Kuminga and Butler have shared the floor for 125 minutes. The Warriors have a -6.8 net rating in such situations. The numbers get more dire when they add Green into the mix; that trio has been outscored by 26 points in 38 minutes. 

That trio closed a pivotal win over the Lakers game last week alongside Curry and Podziemski. Kuminga registered 18 points and nine rebounds, helping swing the game. 

Kuminga’s minutes have dwindled since. Shot-selection problems have cropped back up, as have mistakes as a help defender. Some off-ball cuts haven’t been as sharp, either. The ball sticks more when Kuminga is in the mix. Neither he nor Butler are consistent outside shooters, and they like to operate on similar places on the floor. 

Butler thrived against the Clippers, rising to the occasion with 30 points and nine assists. As long as he’s healthy, there won’t be many opportunities at the backup wing position for Kuminga to sop up because of Butler’s ability to play heavy minutes. 

The Warriors didn’t lose because of Kerr’s decision to bench Kuminga. A trio of Kris Dunn threes, a handful of loose balls the Warriors were too slow to, a late smoked layup by Green, and outstanding performances from Kawhi Leonard and James Harden decided the game. 

At one point, Harden sauntered over to the Warriors’ bench and asked Kuminga why he wasn’t playing, per a source within earshot. 

Kuminga is in his fourth season. In each one, he has had varying roles on the team, spanning from starter and even featured option to completely out of the rotation. Last year, shortly after getting benched in a close loss to the Nuggets, The Athletic reported that Kuminga had “lost faith” in Kerr. Although Kuminga’s raw talent has always been tantalizing, his fit in Kerr’s ball and player movement system has always been a concern. 

The Warriors and Kuminga didn’t come close to agreeing to a contract extension this past offseason, according to sources, making him a pending restricted free agent. Kuminga didn’t demand a maximum level figure, per sources, and he likely won’t get anywhere near that this summer in restricted free agency. 

None of that is particularly relevant for the Warriors. Kerr will call his number at some point, needing his athleticism and downhill threat in certain matchups. He has played well historically against the Lakers and Rockets, the latter of which Golden State would play in the first round with a play-in win Tuesday. 

Curry has already said that for the Warriors to win at the highest level, they’ll need Kuminga to be a part of it. Against more athletic opponents in particular, he can be an asset. The Warriors need Kuminga to stay mentally locked in and ready for whenever his time comes. 

“It’s the test of a young player in this league, and especially with our team,” Curry said. “You never know when your moment will be there…it wasn’t his time tonight. Against Memphis, it could be a game where he makes his presence felt. Don’t let noise outside the locker room, the attention that might come from it, distract you from your ability to make an impact when your number is called. You saw this summer [at the Olympics], DNPs all over the place, you’ve got to be able to be ready.” 

Kerr has praised Kuminga’s attitude publicly and sources in the locker room have likewise noted the 22-year-old’s maturity. That’s not a uniform view; other sources described attitude or effort hiccups of late. 

Work ethic has never been a problem for Kuminga. After Sunday’s loss to the Clippers, he went through a shooting and workout session for over an hour with his personal trainer, Anthony Wells, on the Chase Center floor. 

The line from Kuminga’s camp has been to control what they can control. 

Both Kerr and Curry have recently expressed frustration about the attention Kuminga — and his role — gets from the media and fans. Kerr said on April 4 that there shouldn’t be a referendum every night on Kuminga’s minutes. Curry said “we need to kind of just let this guy play basketball” instead of judging his every move. 

But a DNP, in a game with as high stakes as the finale, is quite a spotlight.



Source link

‘Landman’ Release Schedule: When the Finale Drops on Paramount Plus


Yellowstone season 5 has concluded, but another show co-created by Taylor Sheridan is still in the midst of releasing new episodes.

Landman, the latest addition to Sheridan’s Paramount Plus slate, premiered on the streaming service in November. Described by Paramount Plus as “a modern-day tale of fortune-seeking in the world of oil rigs,” the West Texas–set series stars big names like Demi Moore and Jon Hamm. Billy Bob Thornton plays the lead — Tommy Norris, an oil company crisis manager. The show is based on the podcast Boomtown, from Texas Monthly magazine and Imperative Entertainment, and is co-created by Boomtown host and writer Christian Wallace.

Though it doesn’t carry the hit Paramount Network series Yellowstone, Paramount Plus is the place to find the following shows that involve Sheridan: 1923, 1883, Mayor of Kingstown, Lawmen: Bass Reeves, Special Ops: Lioness and Tulsa King. If you’re excited about Landman, the next series to join that list, here’s a full episode release schedule. 

Read more: Taylor Sheridan’s Big Oil Drama ‘Landman’ Is Fueled by Humor and Heartbreak

How to watch Taylor Sheridan’s Landman

You can watch the first nine episodes on Paramount Plus now. In the US, one new installment arrives every Sunday through Jan. 12 and will be available to stream by 3 a.m. ET/midnight PT. See below for dates.

  • Episode 10, The Crumbs of Hope: Jan. 12

Paramount Plus’ summer price hike brought the monthly price of Essential from $6 to $8 (for new subscribers — the price didn’t rise for existing subscribers). New and existing subscribers now pay more for Paramount Plus With Showtime, which is $13 a month instead of $12. The streamer’s annual plans didn’t increase. 

Sarah Tew/CNET

Apart from the addition of Showtime programming, there are a few key differences between Paramount Plus Essential and Paramount Plus with Showtime. You won’t see as many ads if you have the Showtime plan, and the offering also lets you stream your local live CBS station and download titles for offline viewing.

Read our Paramount Plus review.





Source link

0
YOUR CART
  • No products in the cart.